On this page
English only · Odia translation in progress
What Odisha Loses Next
On 17 August 2026, a bill became law.
It took nine days. Introduced on the tenth of August. Passed on the thirteenth. Signed on the seventeenth.
Nine days.
Now hold that number next to another one.
Odisha spent thirty-three years asking to exist. From the first Utkal Sammilani in 1903 to the first of April 1936, when Odisha became the first province in British India drawn around a language. Thirty-three years of meetings, petitions, pamphlets, and people who refused to stop writing in Odia.
Thirty-three years to gain something. Nine days to lose something.
If you take nothing else from this piece, take that. Power takes decades to build and days to remove. Nobody designed it that way. It is just how power behaves, everywhere, always.
You probably didn’t notice the nine days. Almost nobody did. There was no protest. There was no hashtag. Nothing in your life changed on the eighteenth of August.
That is not evidence that nothing happened. That is the thing that happened.
What the law actually does
Two sentences, no legal words.
One. It puts a ceiling on what Odisha is allowed to charge on its own mineral-bearing land.
Two. It rewinds. Any claim Odisha raised but has not actually collected is treated as though it was never valid in the first place.
To understand why that matters you need one piece of backstory, and it is not the one most people assume.
Odisha was never a state that couldn’t tax. It sets its own liquor excise, its stamp duty, its motor vehicle tax, its electricity duty. Its own tax revenue went from about Rs 15,000 crore in 2010-11 to over Rs 50,000 crore by 2024-25. Nobody in Delhi decides those.
The thing Odisha didn’t have was narrower than that, and stranger.
The Constitution gave states the power to tax mineral rights from the very beginning. Entry 50 of the State List. But it came with a clause bolted onto it — subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral development. The mining law of 1957 is that limitation.
Then in 1989, seven judges of the Supreme Court held that royalty was itself a tax, and that a state charging on top of it was standing on ground the central Act already occupied. That is the ruling that shut the door.
Odisha tried anyway. The ORISED Act, 2004. The Orissa High Court struck it down in December 2005.
On 25 July 2024, nine judges reopened it. Eight to one. Royalty is not a tax, they said, and a state may tax mineral-bearing land. Thirty-five years after the door closed, it opened.
Odisha had the dial for twenty-five months.
Then Parliament put a ceiling on it — using the exact clause that Entry 50 had left sitting there the whole time. Subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament.
The Court said: you have this power, subject to Parliament.
Parliament answered in twenty-five months.
Why you will not feel it
Here is the uncomfortable part. You are not going to be angry about this. Not properly. Not the way you were angry about something small last week.
There is a reason, and it is not that you don’t care.
Losing hurts more than not-gaining. Everyone knows this from money. Losing Rs 1,000 you had in your pocket burns far worse than failing to earn Rs 1,000 you never had. Same amount. Completely different feeling.
But that burn needs a reference point. Something has to go down. A balance. A number you had memorised.
Odisha never collected this money. There is no passbook where the figure dropped. No bank sent a message. The right existed for twenty-five months and was never used, which means there is nothing in anyone’s memory to compare against.
So the emotion that should arrive has nothing to hold on to.
“Then maybe it isn’t that bad?”
No. It means the opposite. It means the loss arrived in the one form we are neurologically worst at noticing. A robbery you can feel. A repricing you cannot.
The losses that end civilisations are never the ones that hurt on the day.
Power first. Money later.
Most people who write about this write about the money. How many thousand crore. What Odisha could have collected.
I think that is the wrong end of the stick.
Money is a number. Power is the ability to change the number.
If you lose money, you can earn it back. Bad year, recover next year. If you lose the ability to set the number, then every number from now on is set by someone else — including all the good years.
It is the difference between a bad month in the market and losing the login to your account. One is painful. The other is permanent, and it doesn’t announce itself, because the account still looks fine on the day you lose the password.
Losing money is a bad year. Losing the dial is every year.
So the rest of this is a map of the losing. Not in rupees. In what Odisha will and will not be able to decide, one year from now, three, five, ten, twenty.
Year 1 — 2027. The year nothing happens
This is the year that will look uneventful, and that is exactly the danger.
What will actually happen is paperwork. A commencement notification. Rules drafted somewhere. A committee. Somebody says “we are examining the matter.” Nothing you can photograph.
Underneath the paperwork, one clock is running fast.
The Supreme Court said the back-dated money is payable in instalments over twelve years, starting 1 April 2026. The new law says anything not actually recovered before it kicks in is void.
Read that again. Not “demanded.” Recovered. Money in the account.
So the only money Odisha keeps is what it physically pulls in during a narrow window. Speed is now the entire strategy.
Odisha has never been fast.
Here is the part that should sting. Jharkhand and Karnataka already had their mineral-land tax laws sitting on the books. When the Supreme Court opened the door in July 2024, they walked through it.
Odisha’s own version died in 2005 and was never revived. The petition to restore it has been pending ever since. Pending is a word Odisha is very comfortable with.
Same judgment. Same day. Two states collecting, one state looking for the file.
The same year, the 16th Finance Commission’s award period begins. Its measure of “demographic performance” changed from fertility rate to population growth between 1971 and 2011. Odisha brought its fertility rate down from 2.9 in 2005 to around 1.9 by 2020 — a genuine, difficult, decades-long achievement. Under the new definition, that achievement counts for less.
Year one has no drama. Year one is a state discovering that the deadline already started and the paperwork isn’t ready.
Year 3 — 2029. The ceiling stops being news
Three years is how long it takes for something new to stop feeling new.
By 2029, nobody will describe the ceiling as a change. It will just be how mineral taxation works. Young officers joining the service will have never known anything else. Journalists will not write “the 2026 amendment” — they will write “as per the Act.”
This is how a temporary arrangement becomes a permanent one. Not by being defended. By being survived.
And there is a second-order effect that matters more. A clause that a state accepted without a fight is a cheap clause to write again.
Ask yourself: if capping a state’s tax on its own land cost the Union nothing in 2026, what is the price of doing it to the next thing?
The bigger 2029 item is seats.
The number of Lok Sabha seats each state gets has been frozen for decades, until the first census after 2026. When that unfreezes, seats follow population.
Odisha did the responsible thing. It brought its birth rate down. Other states did not.
If seats follow population, Odisha’s 21 out of 543 becomes a smaller share of a bigger house.
Sit with the emotional shape of that for a second. It is not neglect. It is not theft. It is being punished for compliance. That is a specific and very corrosive feeling, and it is the one Odisha has the most practice with — which is why it will produce editorials and no movement.
There will be an argument. It will be about a formula. Nobody’s face will be on it.
Year 5 — 2031. Nobody calls Bhubaneswar any more
Now the behaviour changes, and this is where the money story finally starts, five years late.
Put yourself in the chair of a company that wants to mine in Odisha. Go down the list of things you have to negotiate:
Royalty rate? Set in Delhi. Coal has been at fourteen percent since 2012 and hasn’t moved.
Share that reaches the district? A fixed slice of that same number. Delhi.
Whether the mine opens? The state runs the auction, but the clearances are central.
Tax on the land? Capped. Delhi.
So what is left to talk to Bhubaneswar about?
Land. Water. Speed. Silence.
That is the entire remaining menu, and every item on it is a discount. A state that cannot charge can only offer things up cheaper than the state next door. That is not negotiation. That is a race, and everybody running it is running downhill.
2031 is also when the industrial window closes. Plants permitted in 2025-27 are the ones producing in 2030-35. Europe’s carbon border tariff is in force. Green steel reaches cost parity somewhere between 2035 and 2040.
If Odisha’s pitch during those years is cheap ore and easy compliance, Odisha gets more mines and no factories.
Which is exactly what happened the last time, between 1952 and 1993, when the Union paid the freight so a factory in Bombay could buy Odisha’s ore at the same price as a factory in Rourkela. Being next to the mine stopped being worth anything. The policy ended in 1993 and nothing moved east, because by then the factories, the suppliers, the engineers and the customers were all somewhere else.
We are about to run the same experiment a second time, with a different mechanism, on the same state.
Year 10 — 2036. The hundredth birthday
On 1 April 2036, Odisha turns one hundred.
There will be functions. A stamp. Statues garlanded. Somebody will quote Madhusudan Das. Somebody will say we are the first state formed on language, and it will be true, and it will be the proudest sentence anyone says that week.
Now ask the question that a centenary forces you to ask.
In one hundred years, what has this state won the right to decide?
Not what has it been given. Given is easy — schemes, packages, a railway allocation, a new institute. What can it decide?
By 2036 the fiscal ground also starts moving. Mining is about eighty-four percent of Odisha’s non-tax revenue and around forty percent of everything it takes in. The whole political settlement runs on it: mine, collect, distribute as welfare, win the election, repeat.
That loop needs mineral money to keep growing. Coal demand plateaus. Green steel changes what ore is worth and where it gets processed. And the one new instrument that could have replaced some of it — a tax the state sets itself — has a lid on it.
So the equilibrium doesn’t get reformed. It runs out of fuel.
A hundredth birthday is not a nice round number. It is an audit. It is the moment a people compares what it set out to build with what it actually holds.
Year 20 — 2046. The inheritance
This is the loss that matters most and the one no government will ever put in a document, because it cannot be costed.
In 2016, Martin Seligman and Steven Maier published a correction to fifty years of their own work on helplessness. Everyone had assumed passivity was learned — that you start out active and bad experiences break you.
They had it backwards.
Passivity is the default. It is the factory setting. Under stress, the brainstem’s automatic response is to shut down. What has to be learned is the opposite: the expectation that your action changes the outcome. That expectation is installed by repeated experiences of real control, and it is the only thing that overrides the default.
No experiences of control, no override. The default just runs.
So: a child born in Bhubaneswar this year turns twenty in 2046. Between now and then, what experiences of collective control will that child have watched their state have?
Be honest. Go looking.
The province in 1936 — ninety years before they were born, now a holiday and a statue. Niyamgiri, where the Dongria Kondh actually stopped a mine. The cyclone system, which is genuinely world class and is the one thing this state built that works.
That is a short list for a hundred and ten years, and only one of the three is about the economy.
Meanwhile, the list of the other kind is long, and 2026 joins it.
What gets inherited is not poverty. Odisha is not, on paper, poor — the state budget is over Rs 2.65 lakh crore, its debt ratio is among the best in the country, and the District Mineral Foundation has collected more than Rs 34,000 crore, of which it manages to spend about half.
What gets inherited is an assumption. That prices are set elsewhere. That the useful thing to do with a degree from NIT Rourkela is take it to Jamshedpur. That the way forward is a train ticket to Surat, where seven lakh Odias already are.
Nobody teaches this. It does not need teaching. It is what a young person concludes on their own after watching, for twenty years, a state that never once set the price of what came out of its own ground.
And 2046 is the worst possible decade to arrive at that conclusion. The demographic window — a young workforce big enough to staff new industries — closes in the 2040s. By 2040, wet bulb temperatures in western Odisha cross the line where outdoor work becomes dangerous. More than half the coastline is already eroding.
The decade Odisha most needs to be able to decide things is the decade it will have the fewest instruments to decide with.
This is not new. That is the worst part.
In January 1948, Nehru went to the villages near Sambalpur that were about to disappear under the Hirakud reservoir. The people living in them asked him what would happen to them.
“If you are to suffer, you should suffer in the interest of the country.”
He was not being cruel. He meant it, and he may well have been right that the country needed the dam. That is exactly why the sentence matters. It was not a slip. It was the policy, said out loud, to the faces of the people it applied to.
It has never been withdrawn.
Look at the right-hand column first.
| When | What happened | Decided in |
|---|---|---|
| 261 BCE | Kalinga conquered; a hundred and fifty thousand deported | Pataliputra |
| 1568 | The kingdom falls; the last independent Odia state ends | Elsewhere |
| 1803 | Puri occupied; the coast passes to the Company | Calcutta |
| 1866 | Famine kills roughly a third of the population, while rice is exported | Calcutta |
| 1870s | Odia removed from schools as a language of instruction | Calcutta |
| 1903–1936 | The province is fought for, and won | Cuttack |
| 1952 | Freight equalisation begins; proximity to the mine stops being worth anything | New Delhi |
| 1957 | Mineral rights and royalty rates centralised | New Delhi |
| 1957 | Hirakud: 150,000 displaced, Rs 9.5 crore promised, Rs 3.3 crore paid | New Delhi |
| 1993 | Freight equalisation ends. Nothing moves east | New Delhi |
| 1989 | The Supreme Court shuts the door on state mineral taxes | New Delhi |
| 2004–05 | Odisha tries anyway; its own High Court strikes the law down, bound by 1989 | Cuttack |
| 2012 | Coal royalty set at fourteen percent. Not revised since | New Delhi |
| 2024 | The Supreme Court hands the states a dial | New Delhi |
| 2026 | The dial is capped, and the back-dated part erased | New Delhi |
One row is in bold. One row out of fifteen.
The party label changes. The extraction pattern does not.
The one time the column changed
First, look again. Cuttack appears twice.
The second time is 2005 — a court in Odisha striking down a law made in Odisha, because a bench in Delhi had closed the question sixteen years earlier and every court below was bound by it. A local address on a decision that was never really local.
Keep that in mind whenever you read a table like this one. The column tells you where the paper was signed. It does not always tell you where the power sat.
Now the other row.
I want to be careful here, because this is the part where writing like this usually turns into a speech.
The 1903–1936 row was not won by a court. It was not won by a party. Nobody’s ally in Delhi delivered it as a favour.
It was won by a group of people with far less than we have — less money, less literacy, no state, no institutions, no vote worth counting — who made the same argument for thirty-three years until ignoring it became more expensive than granting it.
They had exactly one thing that this generation does not obviously have.
They believed the column could change.
That is not a motivational line. It is the mechanism. Seligman and Maier again: the expectation of agency has to be installed by experience. Those men and women installed it in each other, by meeting every year and watching the argument slowly move. Thirty-three years of small evidence that action produces results.
You cannot skip that part. There is no shortcut where the belief arrives first and the work follows.
So what do you actually do
Four things. Not a five-point plan. Not a vision document.
1. Pass the state law, and collect. Odisha needs its own mineral-land tax statute in force, with demand notices issued and money actually landing in the treasury, inside the window. Everything else on this list is commentary. This is the only item where the clock is already running.
2. Publish one number, every quarter. What Odisha demanded. What Odisha recovered. Two figures, one page, on a government website.
This sounds small. It is the most important item after the first.
Remember the problem from the top of this piece — a loss with no reference point cannot be felt. A published number creates the reference point. It gives people a figure to remember, and next quarter it either goes up or it doesn’t. That is how you convert a structural fact into something a voter can hold in their head.
3. Name who decided. The same party governs in Delhi and in Bhubaneswar. That was sold as friction removed. Friction is also the thing that lets a state say no.
I understand why nobody wants to say this. Saying it costs something. But not saying it costs more, because an argument with no actor in it is not an argument. It is a weather report. Nobody organises against weather.
4. Ask for an instrument, not a package. Packages are announced once, photographed, and spent. Instruments are used every year, by every government, including the ones you did not vote for.
Odisha has spent seventy years getting very good at asking for packages. It has almost no practice asking for instruments. That is the actual skill gap, and it is a habit, which means it is learnable.
What I am sure of, and what I am not
Solid. The 1989 ruling that closed the door, the Supreme Court judgment of 25 July 2024 that reopened it, and its clarification of 14 August 2024. The freight equalisation years and their effects. The royalty rates and their dates. The revenue shares, the DMF collections, the fertility and seat numbers, the climate projections. All of it sits in the SeeUtkal research library and is sourced there.
In the research library, but not independently checked by me. The ORISED Act’s strike-down in December 2005, and whether the restoration petition is still alive. The opening section now rests on both, so check them before you quote it.
Recent, and worth checking against the gazette yourself. The August 2026 amendment — the nine-day passage, the ceiling, and the retrospective clause. Whether it has been brought into force by notification, and on what date, is the single most important fact in this piece, because the collection window depends on it.
A projection, not a fact. Everything under 2029, 2031, 2036 and 2046. Delimitation could land differently. Coal could hold on longer than anyone expects. A state government could move fast and prove the year-one section wrong, which would be the best outcome this piece could have.
An opinion. That power matters more than money here. I have argued it, I believe it, and it is arguable.
You cannot feel a ceiling until you try to stand up.
Odisha stood up once, in 2004. It was pushed back down the year after, and it has stayed down for twenty-one years — long enough that the ceiling has stopped feeling like a ceiling and started feeling like sky.
That is what this piece is about. Not the height of the ceiling.
Whether anybody tries it again.